Ways of Dealing with
that I Would Explore if I Got Cancer
Don Bennett, DAS
we experience it today is unnatural, meaning, we would never have
gotten it 100,000 years ago. So it's not natural for us to get it
the way we do. So, often, it is not enough to just resort to doing
natural things like eating the diet that is natural for us to eat
to get rid of the cancer. Sometimes a person needs to do equally
unnatural things to deal with the unnatural cancer, like the therapies
that I hope you come away with from reading this page is: There
are things we can do to support the body's natural cancer fighting
mechanisms (and chemo is counterproductive in this regard), and
if done along with no longer doing the things that cause cancer,
and with doing some unnatural things to deal with cancers that have
gotten to unnatural stages (including Stage One), many cancers can
a helpful philosophy: We all should assume we have some cancerous
cells so that we adopt super healthy lifestyles now as opposed
to when we get a diagnosis of something serious so that we
have better odds of never having to deal with cancer in the first
place. Let's stop it in its tracks and reverse it BEFORE
we get a diagnosis of it! Much easier to do that with a "pre-actionary"
approach (vs a reactionary approach).
already eat the healthiest of diets, so if someone isn't yet, this
is the first thing to do. See my articles on diet in the articles
section. And yes, the healthiest of diets contains a lot of fruit,
and no, the
sugar in fruit doesn't cause cancer or prevent you from getting
rid of cancer... it actually helps to prevent it and get rid of
Cancer Industry by Ralph Moss
Free by Bill Henderson
Grape Cure by Johanna Brandt
In Healing: The Suppression and Manipulation of American Medicine
by Daniel Haley (special attention should be paid to Dr.
Burzynski and this documentary)
Quest for the Cures Continues
Does Sugar Feed Cancer
Opinion - Interview with Ralph Moss on the corruption in the
(Be sure to watch the "Extras" too!
by Eric Mercola
Can Be Killed - A film by Jeff Witzeman (see write-up below
The Moss Reports
restriction (eat a fruit-based diet, and no, fruit
sugar doesn't cause cancer to grow)
Fasting (depending on what type of cancer it was, and I'd want to
be sure my nutrient levels were "topped off" before fasting)
72 hours (protects
cancer patients against the toxic impact of chemotherapy)
Green juice therapy (consuming only green juices made with organic
Add a worthwhile
nutritional adjunct to your diet (to compensate for the nutritionally
sub-par foods most people are buying). BTW, I do not sell it.
Diet (read the book)
A diet of a small volume of certain fruits (pineapple, raspberries,
orange pulp melons), each one eaten by itself as a meal, being VERY
careful to under-eat slightly, and NO animal foods or oils
of any kind, zero. For EFAs, add equal amounts of ground up hemp
and chia seeds to a smoothie made from the pineapple and raspberries.
Apple peels (for Ursolic acid), red grapes (for Resveratrol), and
(try ordering from Miami
Fruit or Robert-is-Here)
C - either oral
protocol) (big on my list)
D therapy (normalizing one's 25(OH)D level, a must)
IV Therapy (done in a clinic environment). More info here.
H2O2 Therapy http://www.curezone.org/diseases/cancer/h2o2.asp
EWOT Therapy (Exercise
with Oxygen Therapy)
capsules) (don't dismiss this)
Beta Glucan - http://www.betterwayhealth.com,
Cannabidiol Oil (CBD Oil), CBDs from cannabis - article,
Proteolytic Enzymes, http://www.dr-gonzalez.com/history_of_treatment.htm,
O2 Therapy (big on my list, done
in a clinic environment)
Therapy (very important!)
(moves lymph fluid, which is very important)
enemas (detoxifies liver, evicts
parasites, part of the Gerson Therapy)
(no, not the stuff from the hardware store, but 100%
pure gum spirits of turpentine)
also look into GcMAF.
too. And here.
I'm adding this one because, on the surface, it appears to have
efficacy, but who knows. It's a combination of Curcumin, CBD oil,
Vitamin E, and a veterinary product called Fenbendazole (an anti-parasitic
dog de-wormer). Your can hear the story of how it was developed
and how it worked here,
and his website is here.
For those who
decide to do chemo, I'd investigate this first...
Fasting and chemo = better results, less damage. See http://fasten.tv/en/vortraege/longo
Potentiation Therapy (IPT) and here
also. This lowers
blood glucose to 40 to starve cancer cells. It's done both with
and without some chemo. The kind with chemo
uses a low strength chemo agent mixed with sugar. First, insulin
is used to bring down blood glucose to a low level, and then the
"sweet chemo lite" is taken, and the malignant cells suck
it up. This is far less toxic than standard chemo, so no hair falls
out, no nausea, no fatigue, and no loss of appetite. But this is
last on the list for obvious reasons (still subjecting the body
to a poison). But consider that fruit contains natural "chemo"
agents (substances that target cancerous cells), and the fruit sugar
gets these substances into the malignant cells, so this is a more
natural form of IPT with none of the poisonous qualities of IPT
(see the first item under "EATING" above).
For some of the above therapies you'll have to go outside of the
U.S. because some are not approved for use in the U.S. Fortunately
there are some clinics just over the border in Mexico, but this
is a case of "Buyer Beware". Do your due diligence and
vet the clinic you're considering working with. Some are great,
and some are to be avoided. And some therapies can be done at home
if you learn the "how to's" and purchase the equipment/supplement.
Consider using a counselor that can help you navigate this, such
one or this
above info in a paragraph
When someone gets a diagnosis of cancer, besides doing some fasting,
I'd also explore: A zero dairy and animal foods diet, high dose
vitamin C therapy (either liposomal or IV), Vitamin D therapy (normalizing
one's 25(OH)D level using a phototherapy device), B17/Laetrile,
Beta Glucan, Cannabidiol, Insulin therapy (to lower blood glucose
to 40 to starve cancer cells), Proteolytic Enzymes, Ozone Therapy,
H2O2 Therapy, Far Infrared
Therapy, Hyperbaric O2 Therapy, Relaxation Therapy (very important!),
Green Juice Therapy, some coffee enemas (detoxifies liver), and
if you must have some chemo to make your oncologist happy, then
maybe Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT, a type of low toxicity
chemo that is more effective than standard chemo), but a fruit-based
diet is better than IPT. These have been shown to be far more effective
than the standard-of-care conventional treatments, and yet they
are categorized as "woo-woo" quack medicine supposedly
because they are dangerous... and they are, but not to us, they're
dangerous to the profit margins of the medical and pharma industries.
Advice to Avoid Cancer (better than having to get rid of
1. Keep your
internal environment healthy. Eat organically grown whole foods
(fruits and leafy greens). Avoid GMOs. Stay away from processed
foods. Since food matters but nutrition matters too, I add a nutritional
complement to my diet of fruits and greens to compensate for
the nutritionally sub-par food I get from the agri-based food industry
that grows for yield, size, appearance, shelf-life, growth-rate,
pest-resistance, and sugar-content but not for nutritional
content (because there's no profit incentive to do so, and it's
not mandated by government).
the body via healthy living, appropriate amounts of physical activity
and being properly hydrated. Research has led many scientists to
conclude that jumping on a mini-trampoline (i.e. rebounding)
is possibly the most effective exercise devised by man, especially
because of the effect rebounding has on the lymph system.
3. Get sufficient
sunshine. Vitamin D is automatically produced when the cholesterol
in your skin absorbs the ultraviolet B (UVB) rays from the sun.
It then circulates throughout your body to help prevent cancer (and
other diseases). It's interesting to note that your body automatically
produces just the right amount of vitamin D. If you live where the
sun can't make adequate amounts of D in your skin all year 'round
(and many people do), get a phototherapy
device that mimics sunshine. I don't recommend a D supplement
as the best thing you can do when the sun isn't strong enough because
they don't contain all the other nutrients that sunshine makes in
your skin that we need for optimal health, so get a phototherapy
Get enough. And stop doing the things that can interfere with deep
sleep (where the bulk of the nervous system energy is replenished;
this "nerve energy" is used to power your healing processes,
if you don't have enough, over time cancerous cells can become "cancer"
as we know it today.
6. Manage stress.
Unmanaged stress handicaps the immune system and raises the odds
of getting cancer.
and Breast Cancer
Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry
Prostate Cancer Studies Implicating Dairy Products
Milk: Rocket Fuel for Cancer
and Breast Cancer
Why Women Should Not Get a Mammogram
"Cancer and other degenerative diseases can be managed
successfully only by the medical/pharmaceutical industries."
Are What You Eat
Number One Cause of Cancer
I must re-post this article...
scam of cancer industry blown wide open: $100 billion a year spent
on toxic chemotherapy for many FAKE diagnoses... National Cancer
Institute's shocking admission affects millions of patients
by Mike Adams
With $100 billion
a year now being spent on toxic chemotherapy treatments that damage
patients and cause "chemo brain" side effects, a panel
of cancer experts commissioned by the National Cancer Institute
publicly admitted two years ago that tens of millions of "cancer
cases" aren't cancer at all.
Tens of millions
of people who have been diagnosed with "cancer" by crooked
oncologists -- and scared into medically unjustified but extremely
profitable chemotherapy treatments -- never had any sort of life-threatening
condition to begin with, scientists have confirmed.
'cancer' often invokes the specter of an inexorably lethal process;
however, cancers are heterogeneous and can follow multiple paths,
not all of which progress to metastases and death, and include indolent
disease that causes no harm during the patient's lifetime,"
says the abstract of the published study entitled Overdiagnosis
and Overtreatment in Cancer An Opportunity for Improvement (JAMA.
goes on to explain that many tissue lesions in human biology are
being diagnosed with the scary-sounding term "cancer"
even though they would not lead to any real harm in the body even
if left untreated.
a year generated by the cancer industry to treat many patients who
never had "real" cancer in the first place
and the breast cancer industry prey on systematic over-diagnosis
of cancer in order to scare patients into unnecessary treatments.
These treatments are helping generate $100 billion a year in
chemotherapy revenues, often for so-called "cancers"
that shouldn't even count as cancer in the first place. [Many people
believe that medical doctors don't make any money on the prescriptions
they write, and that's true EXCEPT for chemotherapy that is done
in the doctor's office
in this scenario, the doctor is allowed
to profit from the use of the chemo drugs! Could there be a financial
incentive to over-diagnose cancer by these docs?]
patients and the general public must recognize that overdiagnosis
is common and occurs more frequently with cancer screening,"
warns the NCI-commissioned science article in JAMA.
A 2002 editorial
in the Annals of Internal Medicine maintained that the efficacy
of mammograms for younger women is an open question. "The debate
is worth following closely," concluded the editor of the journal,
"because women are deciding about breast cancer screening,
and it's our role to keep them informed as best we can." Yet
it is worth remembering that "mammography screening may lead
to an overdiagnosis of breast cancer, that is, the detection of
a tumor that would not have become clinically detectable in the
patient's lifetime." - from the book "What If Medicine
Disappeared" by Gerald E Markle.
runs on scientific quackery and sleazy fear-based sales tactics
to recruit patients
This all confirms
what I've said over and over again as a consumer health advocate:
The cancer industry uses scare tactics that smack of "medical
terrorism" to recruit frightened women and men into unnecessary
-- but highly profitable -- cancer "treatments" that benefit
no one other than the cancer industry quacks (oncologists).
As first published
in Natural News:
drops a few major bombshells on the way that many cancers are diagnosed.
Breast cancer, for instance, is sometimes not breast cancer at all
but rather a benign condition such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
However, untold millions of women with DCIS have been misdiagnosed
as having breast cancer, and subsequently treated for a condition
that likely never would have caused them any health problems. And
similarly in men, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
(HGPIN), a type of premalignant precursor to cancer, is commonly
mistreated as if it was actual cancer.
of oncology in the United States is in need of a host of reforms
and initiatives to mitigate the problem of overdiagnosis and overtreatment
of cancer, according to a working group sanctioned by the National
Cancer Institute," explains Medscape.com about the study. "Perhaps
most dramatically, the group says that a number of premalignant
conditions, including ductal carcinoma in situ and high-grade prostatic
intraepithelial neoplasia, should no longer be called 'cancer.'"
author of "You Don't Have to Be Afraid of Cancer Anymore"
also adds this:
refers to the detection by screening (mammograms, PSA tests) of
cancers that would not have become apparent to a doctor or produce
symptoms detectable to the patient before an individual died of
other causes. Cancer is prevalent, far beyond the number diagnosed
in human populations, and most adults will die with, but not of,
their cancer. Treatment and invasive or toxic screening methods
(radiation from x-rays, mammograms, needle biopsies) for tumors
that may never progress to cause symptoms or death in an individual's
lifetime would represent overdiagnosis and needless treatment.
about cancer is slowly emerging as cancer industry quackery gets
The good news
in all this is that if you've just been diagnosed with cancer, you
may be a victim of medical quackery and not really have life-threatening
cancer at all.
The first and
most important step in any cancer diagnosis is to be skeptical of
your oncologist and get informed rather than frightened. Don't get
suckered into a toxic chemotherapy treatment by the cancer quacks
who hilariously call themselves doctors. Instead, get educated,
get a second opinion and get yourself a holistic or naturopathic
physician to learn about a vast array of treatment options, lifestyle
changes and other interventions that can prevent, treat or even
it: Even the National Cancer Institute's own scientists publicly
admit that many cancer diagnoses are FAKE and shouldn't be
called "cancer" at all. But the quack cancer doctors keep
calling them cancer because that's what earns them more patients
and revenues. They aren't interested in a truthful diagnosis; they're
interested in scaring you into unnecessary chemotherapy!
the cancer industry has exploded to $100 billion a year in treatment
revenues. As also published on Natural News:
today, more money is spent to treat cancer than to treat any other
disease by far. In fact, according to NBC News, 100 BILLION dollars
was spent on cancer drugs just last year alone...
If you are
diagnosed with cancer in America today and you choose to trust the
medical system with your treatment, you can say goodbye to your
financial future. Even if you have health insurance, you will probably
end up flat broke one way or the other. Either you will survive
and be flat broke, or you will die flat broke.
is how one woman described her experience with chemo...
toxic fluid was being injected into my veins. The nurse administering
it was wearing protective gloves because it would burn her skin
if just a tiny drip came into contact with it. I couldn't help asking
myself "If such precautions are needed to be taken on the outside,
what is it doing to me on the inside?" From 7 pm that evening,
I vomited solidly for two and a half days. During my treatment,
I lost my hair by the handful, I lost my appetite, my skin colour,
my zest for life. I was death on legs.
a victim of the FAKE cancer industry
Don't let yourself
be victimized by a fake medical diagnosis from a cancer industry
doctor. Learn the truth about cancer and take back your health from
the real cancer quacks (oncologists) who profit from ignorance and
fear. [Editor's note: Even though some of the honest oncologists
believe they are offering you the best treatment available, in reality
they are not. But they can only offer what they are taught to offer.
So the primary problem is with current medical education, but since
that is driven by profit, the system does not work in the best interests
of the end-user (patients).
Success Rates Are Growing"
they are not!
the statistical success rates of conventional
cancer treatments are being embellished
is 40 or 50 years old, recalls the term abnormal cells,
which is best described as any abnormal cell with the absence of
cancer. But oncologists are no longer allowed to call them abnormal
cells! They must call them Stage 0 Cancer or Carcinoma
in Situ! Both can be thought of as intentional fear mongering
terms to scare people into chemotherapy who do not need it.
Read the Institute
of Cancers own definition of Stage 0 Cancer as found here.
group of abnormal cells that remain in the place where they first
formed. They have not spread. These abnormal cells may become
cancer and spread into nearby normal tissue. Also called carcinoma
the North American field of oncology did not take the news too well
when the Royal College of Oncologists in the UK, identified that
chemotherapy only had a 2.4% success rate at a 5 year mortality
across all cancers in the United States, so the industry needed
to find a way to increase those numbers. (This "misrepresentative
statistics" also occurs when looking at the "five year
survival rate" stat, which has seemed to improve, with the
medical industry taking credit and implying that better treatments
are the reason. But careful analysis shows that it is earlier
detection that's responsible for the apparent improvement in
survival time, and not because of "getting the cancer earlier",
but because the "five year counter" is started earlier...
the survival rate is still the same when earlier detection is factored
looking into better treatments, like the ones above, the industry
opted to define a new cancer (which specifically indicates that
no cancer is present), and include that in their statistical successes.
be fooled by embellished numbers. 95% of all cancers (which are
the soft tissue cancers like breast, prostate, brain, lung, skin,
ovarian, uterine) have, at best, a 5% chance of reversal through
chemo and radiation, while the treatments above give you better
odds, and are non-toxic.
Food and Cancer
Dr. Bruce Ames* Regarding "Mutagenesis, Carcinogenesis,
and the Degenerative Diseases of Aging"
is plausible as a contributor to cancer. A wide variety of chemicals
are formed during cooking. Four groups of chemicals that cause tumors
in rodents have attracted attention because of mutagenicity, potency,
are formed from nitrogen oxides present in gas flames or from other
burning. Surprisingly little work has been done on the levels of
nitrosamines in fish or meat cooked in gas ovens or barbecued, considering
their mutagenic and carcinogenic potency.
amines are formed from heating amino acids or proteins.
hydrocarbons are formed from charring meat.
and similar furans are formed from heating sugars. Heating fat generates
mutagenic epoxides, hydroperoxides, and unsaturated aldehydes.
Dr. Ames is a Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and
Director, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Center,
University of California, Berkeley. He is a member of the National
Academy of Sciences and was on their Commission on Life Sciences.
He was formerly on the board of directors of the National Cancer
Institute (National Cancer Advisory Board). He was the recipient
of the most prestigious award for cancer research, the General Motors
Cancer Research Foundation Prize (1983), the highest award in environmental
achievement, the Tyler Prize (1985), the Gold Medal Award of the
American Institute of Chemists (1991), and the Glenn Foundation
Award of the Gerontological Society of America (1992). He has been
elected to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the Japan Cancer
Association, and the Academy of Toxicological Sciences. His 300
scientific publications have resulted in his being the 23rd most-cited
scientist (in all fields) (1973-1984).]
Secrets of the Cooking Pan
doctor forced to shut her clinic after wave of death threats and
government regulator pressure
Can Be Killed
by Jeff Witzeman
Can Be Killed is my quest to find out why my wifes life was
threatened by doctors here in the United States. Why on earth would
they perform barbaric procedures that would give her only a 50%
chance of survival? Why were they able to kill the cancer in 30
days naturally with no chemo, no radiation and no radical surgery
the lives of 15 success stories, treated both here and abroad to
find out what works and why. I hope this film gives you the strength
and courage to find the non-toxic cure for you and your loved ones.
film can be viewed on Amazon.
GO FOR TREATMENT
Since so many
contacts I receive ask this question, let me address it here.
So you or your
loved one has cancer and the only options your health care coverage
offers are radical surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation. Or maybe
they are telling you, you are a candidate for immunotherapy. Of
course all of these are toxic options and you know you want better.
So the first task in my opinion (once you get over the shock of
getting the diagnosis) is to OWN the cancer. And by that I mean
taking the position that you played a part in creating it, and therefore
you can play a part in eliminating it. Do some research online to
find out what other people have done successfully. Contact them
if possible on social media and ask them what is possible.
There are many
holistic or naturopathic doctors around the world that have experience
with treating cancer naturally. You can certainly start there by
calling someone local and finding out what they do and what their
success rate has been. The film Cancer
Can Be Killed featured two clinics in the United States
Best in Tempe, Arizona and Utopia
Wellness in Clearwater, Florida. The two clinics in Germany
Am Stein. Germancancerclinics.com
offers a referral service for your specific cancer to a natural
clinic in Germany. And then there are great clinics in Mexico, Switzerland
and even the Philippines. One can do a search on the Internet to
find them. The Gerson
therapy has been around for a long time with a great track record
and they are located in Mexico and San Diego.
Of course most
of this is not covered by insurance . . . yet . . . (see the petition),
so how does one pay for it? You would be surprised how many people
want to contribute to paying for you to recover from cancer. So
start a crowd funding campaign. Post it on social media. Once you
know where you are going and what they are doing, sell your friends
and family why this is the greatest thing ever. Point them to the
Can Be Killed film if they need convincing.
Here are two great
Beat Cancer and Cancer
Tutor. Both have great information with videos, treatment and
your insurance for all its worth. Ask your doctor to do blood
testing for micronutrients and metals or toxins and urine testing
for hormones. Once they find the imbalance, you can use this information
to confer with your [knowledgeable] naturopath what specific supplements
can aid in recovery. If you are a breast cancer patient, find out
where the estrogen or hormone imbalance is coming from and what
options there are to balance that out. If you have to use a pharmaceutical
option, then look at it as a short term solution that you can eventually