Issue 66

 

Largest EV Charging Station in the World
Powered by Diesel-Powered Generator


 

Tesla's Massive 98 Stall California
Supercharging Station Uses Diesel Generators


"As with many Tesla-related things, there is a secret, thinly obscured by an Oz-like curtain, at the Harris Ranch Supercharger. Hidden in plain sight across the way from the Harris Ranch Supercharger's main stations, behind a Shell station, is a small diesel plant that powers Tesla's footprint."


Tesla's Mega 98-Supercharger Location
Runs on a Diesel Generator

 

The Dark Side of Tesla's Largest Supercharger:
A Diesel Generator is Powering it

 

Diesel Plant Found Behind Tesla EV Charging Station

"Oil industry insider David Blackmon notes the irony of diesel-powered Superchargers, and says rising EV use is a 'huge problem' for the US power grid."

 

Tesla "Supercharger" Station Powered by Diesel Generators

 

Energy Absurdity: America's Largest EV Charging Station Powered by - you guessed it - Diesel

 

The Irony of "Green" EV Charging Stations:
The Harris Ranch Tesla Supercharger Station

 

And these were just a sample of the over
20 publications that pushed this story.

 

What do all of the above news articles have in common?

1. They all state that Tesla is, today, using either a "generator" or "generators" to power their Harris Ranch EV charging station.

2. They are all anti-Tesla or anti-EV publications.

3. They are all 100% incorrect.

4. None of them bothered to do any research to verify the accuracy of #5 below.

5. At least one of those articles is based on a 2015 article that surfaced that said that a building on the Harris Ranch property was being powered by a diesel generator...


The diesel generator in question is a portable diesel generator.

That building was a car wash that later became a test battery swapping station and is today being used for storage, and there is no more portable diesel generator.

Back in 2015 when that article came out, it said "how ironic that a diesel generator is powering Tesla's battery swap station" (Tesla has since abandoned the idea of battery swap stations). So, what likely happened was that one of the above publications stumbled across that article from 2015, and misreported it – either intentionally or due to stupidity (or both). And the other publications picked it up and ran with it (because it suited their agenda). But since the 2015 article had a photo of the diesel generator (above), and a little research would show that a small portable generator like that couldn't possibly power 98 EV chargers, the publication that started this swarm of "let's dump on Tesla" articles had to stretch the facts to make it sound like there was a large, permanent diesel generator being used to power Tesla's 98 charging stalls at their Harris Ranch location. To say that this was bad form would be putting it mildly.

W
hen the above nonsensical articles came out about a week ago, the owner of the property – Harris Ranch Resorts – published a "correction" article that said that there is no diesel generator powering anything Tesla related.

 

So, why did all those media outlets report that bogus info?

Any opportunity to impugn or discredit Tesla will be jumped on by those and other publications. They really don't care if the information is accurate or not, as long as it's harmful to Tesla or EVs, that's all that matters. But since a slowing of EV adoption causes more premature deaths due to tailpipe pollution, and the slowing of EV adoption also does something to the planet's environment which is probably not a good thing, those people who intentionally seek to slow EV adoption with lies should be charged with crimes against the people – both the people alive today and those yet unborn. Maybe a few years in prison will straighten them out.

It should be noted than many of Tesla's charging stations include solar panels that charge some of the cars with sunlight, but even if all Tesla chargers had to be powered by gas or diesel generators only, there would still be less overall pollution because EVs can get 120 MPGe, so they would use about one fifth the liquid fuel as their tailpipe counterparts! Was this mentioned in any of the above articles? Of course not. Do you as a consumer of information like to be BS'd by those with ulterior motives? I don't.

 

More about Tesla

More EV info

EV Buyer's Guide