HOME       ABOUT       HEALTHFUL PRODUCTS       CLASSES       COACHING & COUNSELING
ARTICLES         BOOKS         VIDEOS         LINKS         EDU PAGE         EVENTS         CONTACT

 

Raw Food Vegans Have Low Bone Mass,
But May Be Healthy

March 29, 2005

Raw Food Eaters Thin but Healthy

People who follow a raw food vegetarian diet are light in weight but healthy, according to U.S. researchers. It has been suggested that eating only plant-derived foods that have not been cooked or processed might make bones thinner and prone to fractures. But a study in the Archives of Internal Medicine found that, although bones were lighter on this diet, turnover rates were normal with no osteoporosis.

 

Although nutritionists and the food industry have warned that a diet without dairy foods can lead to the bone-thinning disease osteoporosis, the team at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis found the vegans they studied had many of the signs of strong bones.

Vegetarians who don't cook their food have lower than average bone mass, usually a sign of osteoporosis and increased fracture risk. But these researchers found that raw food vegetarians have other biological markers indicating their bones, although light in weight, are healthy.

The study, published in the March 28 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine, was led by Luigi Fontana, M.D., Ph.D., research instructor in medicine in the Division of Geriatrics and Nutritional Science. Fontana and colleagues studied 18 strict raw food vegans aged 33 to 85. All ate a diet that not only lacked animal products, but also included only raw foods such as a wide variety of vegetables, fruits, nuts, seeds, sprouted grains and legumes. They had been on this diet for an average of 3.6 years.

The researchers compared them to people who ate a more typical American diet, including refined carbohydrates, animal products and cooked food. The groups were matched according to age, sex and socioeconomic status. In both groups, Fontana's team measured body mass index, bone mass, bone mineral density, markers of bone turnover, levels of vitamin D, and inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1).

Those on the raw food diet had lower body mass indices and lower bone mass in important skeletal regions such as the hip and lumbar spine, sites where low bone mass often means osteoporosis and fracture risk. But they didn't have other biological markers that typically accompany osteoporosis and fracture risk.

"For example, it is clear from research that higher rates of bone turnover equate to higher risk of fracture," Fontana says. "But in these people, although their bone mass is lower than average, their bone turnover rates are normal."

The raw food group also had less inflammation, indicated by low levels of C-reactive protein, which is made by the liver as a response to inflammation in the body. They also had lower levels of IGF-1, one of the most important growth factors regulated by calorie and protein intake. High levels of IGF-1 have been linked to risk of breast and prostate cancer.

And in spite of the fact that the raw food group didn't drink milk or eat cheese, they had higher vitamin D levels than people on a typical Western diet. Fontana attributes the vitamin D levels to sun exposure.

"These people are clever enough to expose themselves to sunlight to increase their concentrations of vitamin D," he says. "I thought vitamin D might be a problem for them, but it was not." [And we're wise enough to supplement with D if living where the sun isn't strong enough to make D in our skin all year 'round. Actually, D supplementation is NOT the best way to supplement since sunshine makes more than just D in our skin. The BEST way is a phototherapy device that mimics the sun's wavelengths. – Don]

Fontana also measured levels of the hormone leptin, which seems to play an important role in the regulation of bone metabolism. In some transgenic mice, low leptin levels are related to high bone mass. But interestingly, the raw food dieters had both low levels of leptin and lower than average bone mass.

In short, the people on the raw food diet are lighter with lower body fat. They have less bone mass, but they have normal markers of bone turnover, higher-than-normal vitamin D, and very low levels of leptin and inflammatory markers.

So are their bones healthy or not? Fontana says he's not sure. Current clinical measurements would indicate that many in this group should have osteoporosis or less severe bone loss called osteopenia. But with low levels of inflammation, normal bone turnover and high vitamin D, Fontana says the usual clinical parameters may not apply. [This is because the clinical measurements that medical professionals go by apply to a relatively unhealthy population that is eating a diet that plays havoc with their body. The bodies of healthy people need different amounts of things and thus have different levels of things when tested... what's normal for unhealthy people is not necessarily normal for healthy people, and what's abnormal for unhealthy people is not necessarily abnormal for healthy people. – Don]

"For example, post-menopausal, frail women with osteoporosis have low bone mass and an increased risk of fracture," he says. "But they also have increased circulating levels of inflammatory molecules called cyotkines. That's a different biologic condition from what we are seeing in the raw food vegans."

So he is proposing the hypothesis that in spite of their lower than average bone mass, those on raw food diets actually may have a good bone quality and, therefore, healthy bones.

"I base that hypothesis on the fact that their bone turnover markers are normal, vitamin D is higher than normal and inflammation is low," he says. "We think it's possible these people don't have increased risk of fracture but that their low bone mass is related to the fact that they are lighter because they take in fewer calories." [That's only one reason we're lighter. Don]

Fontana says more study is needed to prove that raw food vegans have light-but-healthy bones. One study could involve following large groups of them for years to look at fracture rates. Other, more imminent studies will involve using micro MRI to get a 3-D look at bone architecture and structure. Those studies could begin soon.

[Some points about bones that are not taught to mainstream practitioners: 1) There are dense bones that show up as "good" on a bone density scan, yet are brittle and break easier than, 2) bones that show up not as dense on a scan yet are stronger (resistant to breakage) because they have more flexibility. So bones scans don't show the entire picture regarding bone health. 3) Bone health is dependent on sufficient "usable" nutrients, and a lot of nutrients in the Typical Western Diet are damaged beyond usefulness by cooking. 4) Just because calcium makes up the largest component of bone doesn't make it the most important. The strength of bones is also dependent on enough vitamin D, weight-bearing exercise, sleep, vitamin K, magnesium, etc. – Don]

 

An answer to a "bones" question that was asked of me

If you're asking if the supposed low bone mass of vegans is theory or measured, it is measured. Bone density scans of vegans can show a lower bone density than their meat-eating counterparts, but the test cannot show bone elasticity/resilience/strength.

If you're asking if the bone mass norm of Typical Western Diet eaters is actually overly dense, and the density of the vegans' bones is what's really normal/natural, I'd say yes, that's the case. The reason the orthopedic docs are concerned when they see a "low" bone density for a vegan is because when they see that same low bone density for the average person, their bones are actually at risk, so the docs assume the bones of the vegans are too. But since a bone density scan doesn't show bone elasticity/resilience/strength, the docs can only draw conclusions based on their experience. But we know better. (Isn't it shameful when we know better than medical doctors?)

 

Back to list of Articles